Leo Nadeau: Questions Without Answers?

Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:37:35 -0600 Central Daylight Time


To: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cc: , , , ,

Subject: FWD: Re: George Bush Facts Hello to Professors Rollberg and Ferganchick, all:

I just received this dramatic e-mail from Mr. Nadeau's son. I certainly hope that Mr. Nadeau will be ok. I've sent Mr. Nadeau's son a separate reply.

If Professor Ferganchick may recall, in the origianl Preface to Tim, George Bush and Me, which appears in my original copyrighted book's text, but doesn't appear in my MA thesis and which also doesn't, at this time, yet appear on my website, The George Bush-Undercurrents Website (http://home.att.net/~m.standridge), I also had some car trouble in Houston a few years back, following closely on my attempts to "ask around" at a few places about the book in the 1980 book ad.

By the way, for Professor Rollberg on this:

one other chapter file at my website--which also appears in the paper version of Tim, George Bush and Me--is titled "A Working Title, Author and Source". In response to this chapter's appearance on my website, as well as an e-mail inquiry from me, I received a series of e-mails from a Mr. Kenn N. Thomas up in Wisconsin or Michigan. You can view his e-mail responses at my website. In those responses, he asserts that he, too, heard the radio ad-- and on AM radio, as I had. He says the station he heard it on was WBBM out of Chicago.

Sorry to again send this to your work address, Professor Rollberg, as I know you are busy there. However, you'd told me previously to "keep you posted" as to what happened in relation, specifically, to issues involving Mr. Nadeau.

In Houston, my brakes went out, after I'd had some work done on them. I won't go into detail on this.

However, Mr. Kenn N. Thomas also expressed some anxiety as to his and his family's well-being in this matter, in his last e-mail, which is also available at the website.(Visit Confirmation of Ad) The file that includes Mr. Thomas's e-mail comes up on the main page at the address below:


You can access the same file at my non-commercial Site at Aristotle via Internet Explorer: www.aristotle.net/~mstandridge/adconfirm.htm

My AT&T site is best accessed via Netscape, and is a commercial Site which is also considerably larger than the Aristotle site. Please note that, while the Site is at times highly-political, I have endeavored to "investigate" persons of both political parties and of all political persuasions.

Best to all, (and with hopes Professor Ferganchick is ok there is AZ, after the shooting rampage against Professors at ASU Med),

Max Standridge

----- Forwarded Message -----

-- From: NadL8@aol.com

-- To: mstandridge@aristotle.net=20

-- Subject: Re: George Bush Facts

-- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:50:27 EDT

Hi Max,

I'm Lee's son, Tom. I'll keep this for him to respond, but he was in a car accident last night, and probably won't be able to respond for a while. Not life threatening, but certainly "type" threatening, as he 's got some fairly serious hand injuries. But I will be sure he sees this when he's released.


Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:19:51 -0600 Central Daylight Time


To: , , , , , , , , , ,

Cc: , , , ,

Subject: FWD(2): George Bush Facts

Note to all concerned:

To those who might not have so surmised, I did forward out the following to Mr. Nadeau, as the posting below reveals. I asked him, specifically, about the Chi Chi Jima vault, what might have been in it, what it had to do with Dulles, and what "secret weapon" or UFO-related secret might have been involved, or that Dulles might have been led to think was involved.

As before, I've received no further reply from Mr. Nadeau.

Mr. Nadeau objected to my characterization of his "non-involvment" or possible non-involvement in the events of June 19, 1944. My key use of June 19 events, was as a possible prelude to the September 2, 1944 events, which have been controversial, in part, due to Bush squadron member Chester Mierzejewski's statements. Other things of interest about the 9/2/44 mission, include the seeming alteration of the squadron commander's log, and the way Bush was MIA, when, officially, he was only "missing" in current official accounts, for 4 hours. Most MIA status was/is given after 24-48 hours Odds and ends about the record of the CK Bronson, which I cite at my website, are also interesting possible lead-ins.

Much depends on how active a participant Mr. Nadeau was in the June 19, 1944 events--at least, insofar as whether June 19 was in some way a lead in for September 2. The presence on Guam on June 19 of the Japanese Marianas commander, who was normally on Saipan but had been stranded on Guam as a result of US air attacks that day, is of interest, as well, since the latter commander was in close contact with the Emperor of Japan himself, as the Marianas was Japan's last defensive barrier preventing a US air attack on Japanproper.

Since I'd not had direct word from Mr. Nadeau as to how accurate the versions of events involving him had been, prior to his e-mail, I built one hypothetical scenario on the idea of Nadeau's not having participated in the June 19 flight, being replaced by others, or in some other many being forced to get second-hand accounts for parts or all of the June 19 activities.

There are several other scenarios that would allow that Nadeau was there, but I chose not to go into them in as much detail. However, it is interesting to note that the separation of the crewmen, seemingly required in any September 2, 1944 scenario that was presaged by a prior notification on June 19, was probably a pre-requisite.

One other point on this matter, is that Mr. Leo Nadeau is a private citizen. It is interesting to note, however, that I've never accused Mr. Nadeau of being a direct traitor, rather merely of being a possible non-participant in the June 19, events. He is asserting, in his previous e-mail, that he was a direct participant. This brings up the question of whether the June 19 events were a prelude to the September 4 events or not.

I have included each of you, including former professors on my MA graduate committee, so that you could know of Mr. Nadeau's e-mail to me, and my response, including my questions to him. I have as of this date, three days later, still received no reply from him. I have no reason to think this lack of a reply is any indicator of the truth or non-truth suggested by any question asked of Mr. Nadeau. However, I do note recent media-published statements by former Clinton Administration persons for more US government information on UFOs. Whether UFOs are real, there are several questions to be answered.

The Vesco-Childress text, cited below, along with the Loftus and Aarons book, The Secret War Against the Jews, both cite evidence that Mr. Allen Dulles, a close business associate of Prescott Bush, GHWBush's father, did, indeed, engage in secret and sometimes illegal communications with the Axis in 1944, using couriers to avoid Allied interception. He also was led on by the Axis to believe they had advanced weapons systems. What this means, is unclear, but there are several possible implications, and several possible scenarios, as I describe on my website and in my book Tim, George Bush and Me: The Undercurrents In All Our Lives.


The George Bush-Undercurrents Website

There are additional new implications, including some pertaining to UFOs and ancient technologies, and Axis access to those. This, in turn, would open the door to the idea of "ancient astronauts" or, at the very least, of more advanced knowledge of some things.

On the other hand, the Axis lead-on of Dulles may have been partly or mostly fiction. In any case, it has several implications.

I am waiting to hear further from Mr. Nadeau before proceeding with posting new data or scenarios about June 19, 1944. However, I will eventually posit a new scenario which suggests yet another possibility: that UFOS or secret weapons systems were what were really motivating Dulles's secret negotiations with the Axis. In that scenario, perhaps only the September 2, 1944 mission was in controversy. That would be reinforced by the later date, since that date would have been too late to have been a part of Dulles's election-related activities, which ended with the failure of the assassination attempt on Hitler of July 20, 1944.

Best wishes,

Max S.

----- Forwarded Message -----

-- From:

-- To: =20

-- Subject: RE: George Bush Facts

-- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:49:28 -0600 Central Daylight Time

Dear Mr. Nadeau:

I decided to go ahead and FWd this to you, so that you could have an opportunity to respond.

How well did you know Mr. Bush--and, especially, Allen Dulles, the Bush family's attorney?

How much could you tell about what you really know about the vault at Chi Chi Jima, discussed in Robert Stinnett's book (George Bush: His World War II Years)? What is the real secret of all this?

Thanks again.

Max Standridge

Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:34:42 -0600 Central Daylight Time


To: , , , , , , ,

Cc: , , , , , , , , ,

Subject: RE: Fw: for your info


Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:34:42 -0600 Central Daylight Time

Thanks to Frank Young for this FWD'd e-mail. I thought this info., at least, might be of some usefulness to some of you.

I don't care whether you follow the "chain mail" suggestions or not, but the oil companies/gas stations listed do provide some real world info. for those of us interested in trying to make some small impact on nations trading with the enemy in this war with terrorism. One thought might be to print the list of gas carriers, and distribute it to "larger audiences", such as students or persons involved with students.

While I have your "ear" I might mention that I have heard nothing further from Leo W. Nadeau since the one e-mail. I don't know what this means, exactly.

I'd like to ask him some questions,

such as:

(1) What was in the empty vault on Chi Chi Jima island--an island around which some controversy has swirled regarding Mr. Bush's activities in WW2? There are several theories--and Robert Stinnett, one of Bush's biographers, draws from two separate sources and with two separate theories, as to what was originally in the vault. UFOlogists could have a field day with this. I've posited, extending on D. Hatcher Childress's research into Nazi expeditions into Tibet in the 1930s (predating WW2 by a few years), (research which Childress says seems to confirm the idea that the Nazis found ancient Tibetan documents that detailed how to construct "Vimanas", the flying machines described in some detail in some known ancient Tibetan and Indian texts), that perhaps one of the reasons Dulles was working so hard with the Axis is that he'd learned they had such materials. Is it possible that whatever was in the mysterious vault on Chi Chi Jima--something that had been in the custody of the Japanese gov't until shortly before the US occupied the islands--was one of the "carrots" the Japanese were using in their negotiations with America's Right during that time? If so, much of the mystery of America's super-secret weapons development programs--and much of Dulles's frantic activity in behalf of the Axis post-WW2, could be further explained. I've often thought, for example, that merely hiding his money wasn't enough of an incentive. There were several persons who'd dealt with the Axis and made money from it. They hadn't felt a need to negotiate with Japan secretly.

(2) Did Bush have any inkling that his father's attorney was engaged in such activities at the very time he was a pilot in the Pacific front in WW2? Being Prescott's son, he certainly was in an excellent position to have acted as one of Dulles's couriers. But why would Dulles have been so fascinated by such negotiations? Does mere ordinary greed suffice to explain it? Or were Big Secrets, new energy sources, at stake, that Big Energy/Big Oil had to keep a "lid" on?

(3) Is it just a coincidence that an attorney for Big Energy/Big Oil (i.e., Dulles), would have been so fascinated by the negotiations? Was there a connection between Dulles negotiation attempts and Chi Chi Jima's "empty" vault--if indeed it was as mysterious as it seems? Why did controversy about Bush just happen to involve Chi Chi Jima, of all places?

Leo Nadeau has been a close friend and perhaps confidante of Mr. Bush. What might he know about all of this, in reality?


Max Standridge

----- Original Message -----

-- From: "FRANK YOUNG"

-- To: "TOM KORN","MAX", "Lane M Larrie...

-- Subject: Fw: for your info

-- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:17:56 -0500

-- Original Message -----

From: "Carrol Tilley"

To: "Sydney L Miller" ; "Suzy Gettsinger Adams" ; "Shirley Taylor" ; "Sherry Collier" ; "Sherri Pearson" ; "Paul Bargman" ; "Pamela Fout" ; "Mike Crowell" ; "Mel Askins" ; "Lynn Askins; "Loretta & Martin" ; "lholtz - Laura Holtz" ; "Larry Brents" ; "Joe & Betty Gettsinger" ; "Jerry Clayton" ; "James Brooks" ; "Gail Isabel" ; "Frank Young" ; "Evelyn L. Barnhill" ; "Eddie & Sharon" ; "Don & Serena" ; "Clayton Tilley" ; "Chuck Mobley" ; "Chuck & Renee" ; "Chuck & Melanie" ; "Chuck & Andrea" ; "Chester Reynolds" ; "Caleb & Suzie" ; "C. C. Hodges" ; "Bob & Carolyn" ; "Alfred Boggs"

Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:08 PM

Subject: Fw: for your info

Every time you fill up the car, you can avoid putting more money into the coffers of Saudi Arabia. Just buy from gas companies that don't import their oil from the Saudis. Nothing is more frustrating than the feeling that every time I fill-up the tank, I am sending my money to people who are trying to kill me, my family, and my friends. I thought it might be interesting for you to know which oil companies are the best to buy gas from. Major companies that import Middle Eastern oil (for the period 9/1/00 - 8/31/01).

Shell................ 205,742,000 barrels

Chevron/Texaco....... 144,332,000 barrels

Exxon /Mobil......... 130,082,000 barrels

Marathon............. 117,740,000 barrels

Amoco................ 62,231,000 barrels

If you do the math at $30/barrel, these imports amount to over $18 BILLION!

Here are some large companies that do not import Middle Eastern oil:

Citgo 0 barrels

Sunoco 0 barrels

Conoco 0 barrels

Sinclair 0 barrels

Phillips 0 barrels

Hess 0 barrels

All of this information is available from the Department of Energy and can be easily documented. Refineries located in the U.S. are required to state where they get their oil and how much they are importing. They report on a monthly basis.

Keep this list in your car; share it with friends. Stop paying for terrorism . . .

But to have an impact, we need to reach literally millions of gas buyers.

It's really simple to do!!

Now, don't wimp out at this point...keep reading and I'll explain how simple it is to reach millions of people!!

I'm sending this note to about 25 people. If each of you send it to at least ten more (30 x 10 = 300) . . . and those 300 send it to at least ten more (300 x 10 =3D 3,000) .. and so on, by the time the message reaches the sixth generation of people, we will have reached over THREE MILLION consumers!

If those three million get excited and pass this on to ten friends each, then 30 million people will have been contacted! If it goes one level further, you guessed it . . . THREE HUNDRED MILLION PEOPLE!!!

Again, all you have to do is send this to 10 people.

How long would all that take? If each of us sends this e-mail out to ten more people within one day of receipt, all 300 MLLION people could conceivably be contacted within the next 8 days!!!

Please pass this on.... I think it's worth a shot!

Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:07:36 -0600 Central Daylight Time



Subject: RE: George Bush Facts

Dear Mr. Nadeau:

OK, I'll bite: What are the true facts about Mr. Bush's experiences in the Pacific?

I quoted from Mr. Hyams's book, and cited specific page numbers. I don't know how he came by what information, but he did scramble some dates and names up a bit in connection with the Houle crash. I've never asserted this was intentional on his part.

By the way, have you ever heard of the book or book ad I am researching? It's one of those experiences you never forget, and it gradually occurs to you to look into it. There are a number of possible explanations for it. I have no idea which is the most valid. I'd like to hear yours.

My father was a veteran of the Pacific War, too. He was a Seabee who died, in yet another "synchronicity", this one somewhat tragic, on September 2, 1998.

Best wishes,

Max Standridge

----- Original Message -----

-- From: NadL8@aol.com

-- To: mstandridge@aristotle.net

-- Subject: George Bush Facts

-- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:21:30 EDT

I recently came across one of your web articles. I found it full of misinformation and innuendo. If you'd like the TRUE facts regarding George Bush and his encounters in the Pacific you can contact me at nadl8@aol.com.

Many of the quotes of Joe Hyams that you have alluded to are purely fictional, as much of Mr. Hyams information was supplied by me, a first person participant in the cited events. Many of the "facts" you allude to, do not apear in any of his writings.

Leo Nadeau

Go back to The George Bush-Undercurrents Website